| Abstrak/Abstract |
This forensic linguistics study aims to evaluate whether the prosecutors of the South Jakarta
and Surabaya District Courts in the case of hate speech committed by Ahmad Dhani (AD)
are in accordance with the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE Law) Number
11 of 2018 and ITE Law Number 19 of 2016. In addition, this research also aims to
determine the qualifications of hate speech in AD's case. Data was collected through the
documentation method, which includes collecting data that has been circulating in the
community online, following the legal process written in the South Jakarta and Surabaya
Case Tracking Information System (SIPP), and looking at the results of the District Court
decisions that have been legally binding (Inkracht) Number 370/Pid.Sus/2018/PN JKT.SEL
and Number 275/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Sby. After the data was collected it was analyzed using
a forensic linguistic approach. The language data of the legal case was analyzed through
the approach of the internal structure of language, namely semantics, and the external
structure of language which includes sociolinguistics and pragmatics. The results of this
study show that the speech used by AD has negative diction and can demean his speech
partners, then the prosecutor's charges against AD were not found to abuse the 2016 ITE
Law and there were no rubber articles that caused multiple interpretations. |
