| Abstrak/Abstract |
Purpose:Kelurahansiagaisaformofcommunityempowerment.ThelatestdatafromPusdatinin2013showsthatthepercentageamountofdesaandkelurahansiagaaktifinIndonesiawas65.2%,andinDIYwas94.3%.ThepercentageofkelurahansiagainYogyakartaCityin2016reached100%butexperiencedtorpidity.ThekelurahansiagawasrevitalizedbyestablishingtheSiKesiGemesnetwork.ThisstudyaimedtoevaluatetheimplementationofSiKesiGemesinYogyakartaCity.Methods:Thisresearchusedaqualitativedescriptiveexploratorystudywithasinglecasestudydesign.Theselectionofinformantswascarriedoutbypurposivesampling.Theselectedinformantswerelocalofficialsandnon-governmentalorganizationsregisteredintheSiKesiGemesnetwork.DatawerecollectedusingFocussedGroupDiscussion(FGD),in-depthinterviewsandobservations.FGDswereconductedin2groupsbyundertakingin-depthinterviewswith21participants.Thedatavaliditywasdoneusingtriangulationandpeerdebriefing.Results:TheformationofSiKesiGemeswasdoneusingacombinationoftop-downandparticipatoryapproaches.Thetop-downapproachmeansthatthenetworkisinitiatedandformedbytheHealthOffice,whiletheparticipatoryapproachmeansthatKesiisinvolvedintheregionalnetworkformation.SiKesiGemesplaysaroleinactivatingthecoordinationofKesiandextendingcooperationwithprivatehealthservicefacilities,healthcolleges,andlocalemployers.TheeffectivenessofSiKesiGemesisindicatedthroughtheaccommodationofKesiinthevillagefund,thelivelinessofthevillagecoordinationforums,thefundingfromCSR,theactivenessofUKBMPosbindu,andthepresenceofinnovativeactivities.PublichealthcentersstilldominateUKBMcoaching,andthetrainingdoesnotmeettheneedsofparticipants.Conclusion:TheformationofSiKesiGemesisindispensableforbindingtheinvolvementofthenetworksinsupportingKelurahanSiaga.Kesi,FKKS,andFKSareexpectedtoscheduleregularcoordinationatthevillage,sub-district,andcitylevels. |
