| Abstrak/Abstract |
The Samalas eruption in 1257 and the Tambora eruption in 1815 are the notable major volcanic eruptions in Indonesia. This paper provides a comparative discussion of the post-eruption responses (emergency, reconstruction, and recovery phases) to these two catastrophic events. During the emergency phase, both Lombok and Sumbawa residents exhibited similar adaptive strategies, including seeking higher ground and relocating to safer areas. Distinct differences emerged during the reconstruction phase. While Lombok's recovery was hampered by a lack of external food aid, Sumbawa benefited from Dutch intervention, which facilitated the importation of necessary supplies. In terms of recovery and achieving resilience, Lombok took approximately 100 years to fully recover, whereas Tambora saw a more rapid resurgence by 1847, with restored agriculture and livestock conditions. This comparative discussion underscores the importance of understanding historical responses to volcanic eruptions and offers valuable lessons for future generations. Incorporating contemporary geological and socio-economic data into mitigation strategies is essential for managing similar events in the future, not only for high VEI volcanoes but also for those with potential for major eruptions. |
